Danny Boyle has expressed both frustration and pride regarding the striking zombie nudity featured in 28 Years Later, the anticipated follow-up to his renowned 2002 horror film. As the conversation around Danny Boyle discussing zombie nudity in 28 Years Later gains attention, the director believes that certain choices—while controversial—ultimately serve the film’s artistic goals and underscore why watching it in theaters is essential.
The creative decisions and challenges behind explicit scenes
The film’s notable use of nudity is among its most attention-grabbing elements, although the story and performances continue to win over both audiences and critics in its opening weekend. According to Variety, Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland spoke about ongoing plans for the franchise, highlighting a sequel helmed by Nia DaCosta and a third installment Garland is currently writing. When the topic of nudity arose, Boyle indicated that discussions with Sony about the graphic nature of the visuals were extensive. However, the studio ultimately sided with his creative instinct.
Boyle’s experimentation with filming techniques also becomes part of the conversation. Having shot the movie using iPhones, Boyle explained that he has struggled to share what makes this approach special, noting limitations imposed by platforms like YouTube due to the explicit imagery. This technical and promotional challenge has directly affected how Boyle can showcase some of his proudest work from the film to a wider online audience.

Notorious train scene exemplifies Boyle’s vision
One particular scene has generated significant conversation: a moment when the film’s main undead antagonist, known as the Alpha, attacks a character. The Alpha is depicted without pants, underscoring a level of realism and daring not often seen in the genre. Although this sequence is presented only fleetingly in promotional trailers, its content has proven too provocative for mainstream online platforms.
Describing the difficulties involved in filming and sharing this scene, Boyle stated,
“Is we can’t show it on YouTube because of its content. It’s the perfect illustration of how we want the cameras to work. There’s a scene where the Alpha drops into the train. You can see his genitals and then what he’s done to poor Erik from Sweden at the end of the shot, all in one. That was challenging to set up, and we were hoping to exploit it a bit more in the promotion of the film.”
—Danny Boyle, Director
As a result of these restrictions, the entirety of Boyle’s vision can only be experienced in cinemas.
Why audiences should experience the film in theaters
Despite the promotional hurdles, Boyle has turned this limitation into a reason for moviegoers to seek out 28 Years Later on the big screen. He made a direct appeal to audiences, stating,
“You have to go to the cinema to see it. It’s worth it. I don’t normally recommend it directly in that way, but that shot is worth it.”
—Danny Boyle, Director
Citing the power of his chosen filmmaking techniques and the unique atmosphere of a theater, Boyle insists that the full effect of both the technology and the bold narrative choices—including the infamous train scene featuring Erik and the Alpha—are best appreciated in person.
The evolving franchise and what’s next
28 Years Later is just one chapter in a franchise that continues to evolve, with Alex Garland penning further stories, Nia DaCosta taking the director’s chair for the next installment, and cultural figures like Michael Sheen and Cillian Murphy remaining tied to its legacy. The film’s willingness to push boundaries and defy norms aligns with its broader themes, which embrace mortality and transformation in a world that refuses to shy away from uncomfortable truths. For viewers, the movie is both a continuation of a beloved saga and an invitation to confront challenging ideas—on the largest screen possible.