Legal Setback for Indiana: A legal setback hit the state of Indiana as a judge dismissed its lawsuit against TikTok, citing challenges related to jurisdiction. Judge Jennifer DeGroote from Allen County Superior Court in Fort Wayne, Indiana, ruled that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over TikTok. The decision hinged on the argument that downloading an app at no cost does not constitute a “consumer transaction” under the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.
The lawsuit, initially filed in December 2022 and later consolidated, marked the first significant action by a state against the popular social media platform. Similar legal battles are ongoing in other states, including Arkansas and Utah. Despite the setback, the office of Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita expressed both respect for the ruling and disagreement on various points, considering potential appellate options.
Rokita emphasized Indiana’s role as the first state to legally challenge TikTok, characterizing it as a “malicious and menacing threat” from a Chinese company causing harm to unsuspecting users. The lawsuit accused TikTok of attracting young users with false safety claims while exposing them to inappropriate content. Additionally, it alleged the company collected sensitive data and misled consumers about the protection of this information from the Chinese government and Communist Party.
Also Read: TikTok Challenges Gatekeeper Status: A David vs Goliath Battle in EU Tech Regulation
TikTok has not yet responded to the recent legal development. The dismissal in Indiana follows a broader trend of increased scrutiny on social media platforms, particularly regarding their impact on user safety and mental health. The heightened attention comes after revelations from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen in 2021, exposing internal documents detailing potential negative effects on young users’ mental health.
While the legal battle in Indiana faces a setback, the fight against tech giants continues in various jurisdictions. Last month, Indiana joined numerous states in a lawsuit against Meta, the parent company of Instagram, citing concerns about the addictive nature of its features and potential harm to young users’ mental health.
The evolving landscape of legal challenges against prominent tech platforms underscores the broader conversation around the responsibilities of social media companies and the need for regulatory measures to address issues of user safety and privacy.
Our Reader’s Queries
What are the rules for ADU in Indiana?
The living area size for an accessory dwelling cannot exceed 50% of the primary dwelling and must range from 220 to 800 sq ft. While an RV is not allowed, a manufactured home is permitted. The accessory dwelling can be located in the side or rear yard, but not in the front yard. It is mandatory to have an approved sewage disposal system (sewer/septic) and water utilities.
What is R4 zoning in Indiana?
The R4 Residential District is designed to accommodate the construction of single-family homes in a denser range of 1.0 to 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This district is perfect for those who want to live in a community with a higher population density while still enjoying the comfort of a single-family home.
Can you live in a camper in Jackson County Indiana?
Unfortunately, it is not allowed to occupy an RV on your property as per the County’s regulations. The use of Recreation Vehicles as residential structures is not permitted.
What are the setback rules in California?
When it comes to accessory structures, setbacks are important to consider. The front property line should have a minimum distance of 35 feet, while the back and side property lines should be at least 10 feet away. Additionally, any easement should have a minimum distance of 3 feet. If the accessory structure extends beyond 75 feet from the front line, the back and sideline distance should still be 3 feet. These guidelines ensure that accessory structures are safely and properly placed on the property.