Blake Lively has become the center of a powerful legal controversy as Justin Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, calls for her upcoming deposition to be made public, either through a live online stream or by holding the session at Madison Square Garden. This proposal surfaced this week after Lively agreed to testify in the ongoing lawsuit involving allegations and countersuits between the two celebrities, igniting immediate debate and distress within the legal and entertainment communities.
“Since Ms. Lively is open to testifying, let’s make it count,”
Freedman announced in a statement, his words highlighting the intensity of the moment. He elaborated,
“Hold the deposition at MSG, sell tickets or stream it, and donate every dollar to organizations helping victims of domestic abuse.”
With such a public approach suggested, the call signals escalating frustration and a desire to turn personal battles into potential public benefit, although the strategy has drawn sharp criticism as well as international attention.
The dispute originated when Blake Lively filed a lawsuit against Baldoni in December 2024, alleging sexual harassment during the filming of It Ends With Us. Baldoni has firmly denied these claims, instead launching a $400 million countersuit that accuses Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and others of defamation and civil extortion. Confirming the seriousness of the legal conflict, Baldoni is expected to testify at the March 2026 trial, which will not allow courtroom cameras, while Lively will also take the stand according to her attorney, Mike Gottlieb.
Freedman’s suggestion to make Blake Lively’s deposition a ticketed or livestreamed event has fueled criticism from Lively’s legal team, who argue that Baldoni’s lawyers are creating a “media circus” and exploiting celebrity platforms. Gottlieb emphasized that the focus must stay on the workplace allegations and not descend into spectacle. Freedman, however, remains adamant, insisting that Lively’s fame has been used to manipulate public opinion and that transparency in her testimony is necessary.
The outcome of this proposal could deeply shape both the public’s perception of the legal process and the experience of the parties involved. As the court date draws nearer, the question of how Blake Lively’s deposition will be handled continues to fuel widespread distress, uncertainty, and intense debate, potentially impacting future high-profile legal battles in the public eye.
