Candace Owens took a decisive step on her podcast when she revealed her private messages in response to the recent legal move that saw Blake Lively subpoena Candace Owens texts. This development is part of an expanding court case involving Lively, Justin Baldoni, and various content creators, where accusations and frustration continue to rise as the situation unfolds publicly.
Lively’s Legal Action Pulls Content Creators Into the Spotlight
According to recent court filings and coverage by outlets including TMZ, Blake Lively has initiated formal legal proceedings by sending subpoenas to a number of digital creators, among them Candace Owens, Perez Hilton, and Andy Signore. The subpoenas stem from allegations against Justin Baldoni, with claims that a smear campaign targeting Lively was orchestrated through social platforms and amplified by a network of creators and larger news outlets to create negative sentiment about the actress. Attorneys for Lively have focused on the role these digital creators played, saying the team behind the alleged campaign used platforms like Reddit and relied on influencers to spread content that would harm Lively’s reputation.
The team would then ‘amplify’ that content by sharing it with larger outlets to increase negative sentiment toward Ms. Lively.
—Attorneys for Blake Lively
Owens, among others, was named in the legal action, yet she asserted she had not received direct service of the subpoena at the time details were leaked. She expressed discomfort at learning about the subpoena through the media rather than official channels, outlining her confusion and willingness to clarify the situation.
Given the fact that I have not received any subpoena yet, I appreciate Blake’s team leaking this to TMZ to alert me to it. And, of course, I have not the slightest idea what I am being subpoenaed for, as I knew none of these parties when their respective lawsuits were filed. But stay tuned, and I’ll let audiences know on my podcast.
—Candace Owens, Author and Broadcaster
Owens Goes Public With Her Private Messages
Faced with the legal controversy, Candace Owens took the unusual step of live-broadcasting the search of her own messages during her podcast, effectively “subpoenaing” herself for her audience. Using the search term ‘Blake Lively,’ she identified only two relevant exchanges that predated the December 2024 lawsuit against Lively.
The first message dated January 3, 2019, featured Owens complimenting Lively’s jewelry during a conversation with a friend named Christy. The second message, from August 2024, showed Owens discussing with her producer, Skyler, the heightened public interest in Lively’s activities, suggesting they cover her on the podcast due to her going viral at the time. Owens presented these benign messages as evidence of her lack of involvement and mocked the idea that such discussions could form the basis of a smear campaign prosecution.
I say, ‘Blake Lively’s’, with the heart eyes. And she writes back, ‘This is a pink diamond and it’s flawless.’ Oh my god, lock me up, Judge Liman. I said something nice about Blake Lively in 2019.
—Candace Owens
We should cover Blake Lively as well. Very viral at the moment.
—Candace Owens
Direct Accusations and Emotional Fallout
As tensions increased, Owens didn’t hide her negative feelings towards those involved in the lawsuit, specifically criticizing Lively and Ryan Reynolds. She described her personal reaction to the emergence of the legal dispute.
I truly looked at this lawsuit when it all came out in January, okay? And I just thought that you were a bad person. Truly, that was from the bottom of my heart. I think you and Ryan are bad people. There is nobody involved.
—Candace Owens
Owens voiced that she learned much of her information through an audience tip line opened specifically after the news broke, emphasizing the need to protect her informants as a journalist in the contentious atmosphere surrounding the highly publicized trial. This layer of secrecy and combative rhetoric only heightened the turmoil enveloping the case.
Other Influencers and Executives Drawn Into Legal Proceedings
The subpoenas were not limited to Owens alone. Other digital personalities such as Perez Hilton, known for his confrontational coverage of celebrity news, and Andy Signore, a YouTuber who frequently analyzes legal battles in pop culture, were also ordered to provide documents. Hilton has faced legal scrutiny in past celebrity showdowns and has been featured in a documentary centered on the Lively-Baldoni dispute. Notably, he was previously represented by Bryan Freedman, the same lawyer now acting for Baldoni. Signore attracted attention for publicizing a statement from Freedman ahead of other outlets. Additionally, music executive Scooter Braun is said to have been required to submit documentation related to Melissa Nathan’s crisis management in the escalating situation. The reach of these subpoenas hints at the scale of the inquiry, spanning entertainment, online media, and crisis PR operations.
Ongoing Support for Justin Baldoni Amid Legal Strife
Candace Owens, from the outset, has forcefully aligned herself with Justin Baldoni, treating Lively and her close associates, including Ryan Reynolds, as adversaries. In the wake of Baldoni’s massive lawsuit, Owens amplified her accusations, suggesting through YouTube that Taylor Swift—who had been notably connected with Lively and Reynolds—may have played a role in encouraging negative coverage, implying potential manipulation of major news outlets.
She later lashed out at Lively and Reynolds for mocking Baldoni through fictional characters in the credits of recent projects, pointing to Lively’s use of the alias Gordon Reynolds, formerly Nicepool, as an example. Owens claimed this kind of veiled jab resembled Swift’s approach of subtly referencing former relationships in her songwriting credits and suggested Lively had been inspired, or perhaps advised, to mirror such tactics in her film. The host further speculated Swift’s behind-the-scenes involvement stretched across related entertainment ventures, including “Deadpool & Wolverine” and “It Ends With Us,” offering this as cause to suspect the coordination of public narrative against Baldoni.
Next Steps in a Case Marked by Public Drama and High Emotion
The court continues to grapple with an expanding network of subpoenas, combative statements, and open hostility, as witnessed by Candace Owens’s display of personal texts and persistent defense of Justin Baldoni. With the trial scheduled for March 2026, the cast of key entities—from legal professionals like Bryan Freedman and Melissa Nathan to high-profile figures such as Taylor Swift, Perez Hilton, and Scooter Braun—remains under scrutiny. For now, Owens’s public dissection of her own involvement and the ongoing outrage mirrors the intense frustration running through all sides of this complex legal showdown involving the wide-reaching Blake Lively subpoenas Candace Owens texts dispute.
