James Woods Slams TMZ: “Stick to Celebrity Ass Licking”

Actor and outspoken conservative James Woods fiercely criticized TMZ following its coverage of Don Lemon’s recent arrest. Woods took aim at the celebrity news outlet on January 31, 2026, accusing TMZ of overstepping its bounds as it expressed alarm about the future of democracy after Lemon’s detention.

The controversy arose when TMZ posted a video on X questioning the potential impact of Lemon’s arrest on democratic institutions. The outlet implied that such arrests could threaten the core of democracy, sparking backlash from Woods and others who viewed TMZ’s commentary as hypocritical and insincere.

TMZ’s Alarm Over Democracy and Don Lemon’s Role

TMZ’s coverage included a video asking,

“Don Lemon has been arrested. Could this change democracy forever?”

which was shared on social media platforms on January 30, 2026. TMZ’s host Harvey Levin went further by suggesting that the Trump administration’s actions resemble a dictatorship. Levin condemned Lemon’s arrest, describing it as “insane,” and claimed that journalists like Lemon were merely fulfilling their duty by covering protests.

Levin highlighted the importance of a free press in maintaining democracy:

“The framers of the Constitution knew that a free press was essential to a democracy. Without a free press, you don’t have a democracy. And it’s real clear that Donald Trump and company doesn’t want a free press.”

He defended Lemon’s actions at a protest in Minneapolis, explaining that Lemon was simply reporting on national events and dismissing claims that Lemon was participating in the demonstration.

James Woods Responds Harshly to TMZ’s Position

James Woods did not accept TMZ’s portrayal of itself as a journalistic entity and launched a sharp retort on X. Calling out the outlet’s credibility, Woods referenced a past incident where TMZ staff allegedly celebrated the false news of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Woods stated:

James Woods
Image of: James Woods

Your staff cheered when Charlie Kirk was pronounced dead of an assassin’s bullet. No one buys that you’re any more of a “journalist” than Don Lemon is. Stick with licking celebrity ass. That’s your wheelhouse.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods)

This response mocked TMZ’s attempts to cast itself in a serious light and insisted it should remain within its established domain of celebrity gossip.

Public Reaction and Debate on Press Freedom and Accountability

The incident ignited a variety of opinions on social media. Some users echoed Woods’ contempt for TMZ’s approach, while others defended the necessity of press credentials, clarifying that a press pass does not excuse illegal behavior. For example, Morgana Le Faye emphasized:

A press pass doesn’t exempt people from crimes they commit.

— Morgana Le Faye *Patriot *America 1st*

Other voices pointed out inconsistencies in outcry over journalist arrests under different administrations. One user commented:

Excuse me? Under Biden-Harris is this the approximate numbers of “journalists’ arrested, detained, or charged: 2021: 59, 2022: 10-20, 2023: 15, 2024: 49. PS: You never spoke up once on behalf of these people.

— Tired of being politically correct

Others accused TMZ of gaslighting, suggesting the outlet’s reaction was disingenuous, while some mocked TMZ’s priorities, joking about its focus on celebrity gossip rather than serious issues.

The Broader Implications for Media and Political Discourse

This dispute highlights ongoing tensions surrounding media credibility, political bias, and press freedom in the United States. TMZ’s coverage attempted to position Don Lemon’s arrest as a threat to democracy, while critics like Woods perceive it as opportunistic posturing that undermines authentic journalism. The polarized responses reveal a growing distrust in mainstream outlets and the complexity of balancing public safety with press rights during politically charged events.

As this situation develops, attention will likely remain on how high-profile arrests are reported and interpreted across different media platforms. The debate underscores the fragility of trust between the public, journalists, and news organizations amid increasing political and cultural divides.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here